To Lee or not to Lee
Washington-Loving and Washington Liberty. These are the two names the renaming committee for Washington-Lee High School has decided on. They have presented these two names to the School Board as their top suggestions and the new official name of the school will be discussed on December 20.
This past fall, the Arlington Public Schools (APS) department of School and Community Relations partnered with Principal Dr. Gregg Robertson to create the committee that carried out the name change process for the school, an action that was decided upon this past summer. This committee includes four student representatives, one from each grade. These representatives were chosen from a survey sent out to students this summer, asking for a name and grade. They held several meetings in the fall along with encouraging the community to provide feedback through communication with their representatives and a forum posted on the school website.
“The general student opinion on the name change based on my discussion with classmates [is that] there are a lot of people who do not want to change the name [and want] to keep it completely Washington-Lee. There are a lot of people who do [want to change it] so when it comes to general opinion I would have to say its 50/50,” junior class representative Chloe Slater said. “The majority of the people who want to keep the name don’t understand the reasoning behind why we want to change the name, and when I would explain it they would be like ‘oh I agree. I think people just need to get educated on why we want to change it.”
In regards to what that reason is exactly, it comes from more apparent and outward white supremacist movements in the country, like the “Unite the Right” rally, also known as the Charlottesville rally, that occurred last year. Historical figures such as Robert E. Lee have become idols for these movements, sparking conversation across the country about the statues, schools and other symbols commending those who fought for the confederacy. The School Board feels that the current name of the school shows a backward message that should not be upheld today. Some students, however, refute that as a reason to change.
“Just because Robert E. Lee owned slaves [and fought for the confederacy]… doesn’t mean that the people that go here, and the school, stand for slavery,” junior Lucy Pappa said.
The school’s alumni shared similar sentiments to the students’ opinions.
“History cannot be changed. Whether we agree or disagree with it, it is what it is. As the first African American to graduate from W-L [in 1961], to now change the name is to change my history, and I will not have anyone do that. While we look upon some things in horror and disgust, we must respect our history and not try to change it or repeat it,” Charles Augins, the first African American to graduate from the school, said.
Others simply think that the name change will create more problems, including the costs to change the name throughout the campus and changing uniforms for sports teams.
“This name change personally affects me as a cheerleader because it is now our job to completely change not only our cheers for sideline, but come up with new ways to spell out our name at competitions. With this change, we are going to have to spend more time on coming up with new cheers instead of focusing on competition season. We usually never spend too much time on cheers for sideline because competition is such a vital part of the fall team,” varsity cheerleader captain junior Maddie Koch said. “Taking time away from competition means less opportunities for our team to advance through to competitions like regionals and states.”
The many voices and perspectives surrounding the name change of Washington-Lee are diverse and passionate, and are bound to come to a head on December 20 when the name change is discussed. Slater is confident in the future of the new name.
“A lot of people are scared of the word change and the impacts it has, but when discussing this topic, people should think more of this as a name update,” Slater said. “We are not trying to forget the past, merely show what we have become today because of it.”
An earlier version of this article misreported that the School Board plans to make a decision on the name on December 20. The board will discuss the name change, but has not set a final date for a decision.
Dean Fleming • Dec 12, 2018 at 8:54 AM
Good morning.
Just thought I’d let you know there is a significant error in the most recent Crossed Sabres. It says on Dec 20th, the school board will decide on the new name. That is wrong. The name recommendations will be presented by a couple of the naming committee members.
Please see the correct dates and times for 3 extremely important dates regarding the name change.
Important dates and agenda items are as follows:
12.19.18 at 10am
Arl Co Circuit Court Hearing regarding the name change. The students and parents deserve to know about this. This is open to the public.
12.20.18 6:30pm
School board meeting. This is the meeting where the names the committee recommends will be presented.
1.10.19 6:30pm
school board votes on a new name.
The word should get out regarding ALL of these dates.
Since time is short, perhaps an announcement should be made over the PA as well as a school sanctioned media blast.
I hope this is helpful. Any questions or concerns, please let me know.
Thanks
Dean Fleming
W-L Alumni Association VP
571.999.3400
Tom Hafer '66 • Dec 5, 2018 at 11:32 AM
On December 20, the School Board will vote to change the name of Washington-Lee to “Washington-Loving”. It is a moral certainty that this will pass.
Since this is ostensibly being done for the students, and since you will certainly bear the brunt of whatever effects this will have, shouldn’t you at least have some voice in this?
My suggestion is this: request the School Board to hold off on a vote to rename the school until a referendum is held within W-L. The referendum will have a simple choice: Washington-Lee or Washington-Loving. Hold the referendum as soon as possible and present the results to the School Board. Of course, they do no have to act on your results, but it will be interesting to see their explanation if they do not.
Same Name • Dec 4, 2018 at 7:17 PM
Why is no one discussing the price tag to rebrand the school. The current estimate is $1,000,000!!! Why is the focus on keeping the”W-L” and not on “Generals”? Also, students, alumni, and parents were never surveyed before this name change was pushed through by a select few. A real survey would show the majority dies not support the change. Shame on the school board for forcing this on the community and wasting money the school system is in desperate need of.